This article outlines a methodological framework for re-examining the Moldavian Csángós in the context of Romanian biopolitics and population policies during WWII. The second part focuses on the common elements of each author, followed by a section of comparative perspectives, where we observe how the student activity and the religious spirit (two support pillars of the Iron Guard) may involve multiple valences of historiographical interpretation. Each work is analysed separately, seeking to observe traits of their specificity and originality. A first part aims to compare the authors’ interest on researching the subject, as well as the methodological similarities and differences between their books. Clark’s book analyses the local and regional activity of the Iron Guard while Sandu’s work uses sociological research. In their work, the writers adopt a broader understanding of the legionary phenomenon as an indigenous version of European fascism, reconfiguring Captain Codreanu's image in two provocative biographies. In this context, the present article aims to analyse the works of Oliver Jens Schmitt, Tatiana Niculescu, Roland Clark and Traian Sandu. The scholars tried to understand the Iron Guard from a synchronous historiographical perspective called the "new consensus", theorized by Roger Griffin. In recent years, many works dealing with the phenomenon of the Legionary Movement have appeared.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |